Expressing the Structural Nature of Development Discourse Analytical and Graphically Using a Qualitative Comparative Model of Thinking and Acting

Two of the most well-known clashes of development ideas are the realist-liberalist discourse and the environmental-social justice discourse, which are competing for the opportunity to influence decisions that determine what type of, how, where and when development should take place. The first type of discourse can be considered the old one, where realist want a strong state driven, but closed development model while the liberalists envision a weak state driven, but opened development model. This can be considered, the original or seminal one-dimensional development discourse usually known as the extreme authoritarian centralism and unrestrained liberalism (Cameliau 2002). The second type of discourse is a relatively new one, where some advocate the implementation of ecology-centered development while others advocate the implementation of society centered development. For example, Morito (2003) indicates that environmental strategies such as preservation approaches can become